When it comes to managing JavaScript packages, three tools dominate the landscape: npm, Yarn, and pnpm. While they all serve the same core purpose—installing, updating, and managing dependencies—they have different philosophies, performance characteristics, and features. Here’s a detailed look at how they compare.
1. History and Popularity
| Tool | Released | Popularity | Notable Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | 2010 | Default for Node.js | Oldest package manager, automatically comes with Node.js |
| Yarn | 2016 | High | Created by Facebook for speed and reliability |
| pnpm | 2016 | Growing | Focuses on disk space efficiency and deterministic installs |
Summary: npm is everywhere by default. Yarn became popular for large projects. pnpm is newer but gaining traction in enterprise projects for efficiency.
2. Installation and Disk Usage
| Tool | Node_modules Structure | Disk Efficiency |
|---|---|---|
| npm | Flat, can have duplicates | Uses more disk space |
| Yarn | Similar to npm (Classic) | Slightly better caching |
| pnpm | Symlinked store (node_modules is shallow) | Very efficient: avoids duplicate packages |
Takeaway: pnpm saves disk space and speeds up installs by keeping a global store of packages.
3. Performance
| Tool | Speed | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| npm | Moderate | npm v7+ improved parallel installs |
| Yarn | Fast | Yarn v1 is fast; v2 (Berry) introduces Plug’n’Play |
| pnpm | Very Fast | Efficient installs, especially for monorepos |
Tip: pnpm often outperforms npm and Yarn on large projects due to its unique linking strategy.
4. Lockfiles and Determinism
| Tool | Lockfile | Deterministic Installs |
|---|---|---|
| npm | package-lock.json | Reliable but can be verbose |
| Yarn | yarn.lock | Highly deterministic |
| pnpm | pnpm-lock.yaml | Deterministic, handles multi-package repos well |
Advice: All three support reproducible installs, but pnpm excels in monorepo setups.
5. Monorepo Support
| Tool | Built-in Monorepo Support | Tools |
|---|---|---|
| npm | Limited | Workspaces added in v7+ |
| Yarn | Excellent | Workspaces fully integrated |
| pnpm | Excellent | pnpm Workspaces, optimized linking |
Summary: Yarn and pnpm are better suited for monorepos out of the box.
6. CLI Differences
| Command | npm | Yarn | pnpm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Install dependencies | npm install | yarn install | pnpm install |
| Add package | npm install package | yarn add package | pnpm add package |
| Remove package | npm uninstall package | yarn remove package | pnpm remove package |
| Run scripts | npm run script | yarn script | pnpm run script |
Observation: pnpm commands are mostly compatible with npm/Yarn, but workspace handling differs slightly.
7. Caching & Offline Support
| Tool | Caching | Offline Support |
|---|---|---|
| npm | Limited | No |
| Yarn | Yes, stores tarballs | Yes |
| pnpm | Yes, global content-addressable store | Yes |
Key Point: pnpm and Yarn allow faster re-installs thanks to caching.
8. Unique Features
-
npm:
-
Default, comes with Node.js
-
Widely supported, massive ecosystem
-
-
Yarn:
-
Plug’n’Play (v2+) avoids
node_modules -
Excellent workspace/monorepo support
-
Workspaces with deterministic installs
-
-
pnpm:
-
Efficient disk usage with symlinks
-
Faster for large projects
-
Strong monorepo support
-
Strict node_modules layout avoids phantom dependencies
-
9. Community & Ecosystem
| Tool | Community Size | Adoption |
|---|---|---|
| npm | Very large | Standard in Node.js projects |
| Yarn | Large | Popular with React/FB projects |
| pnpm | Medium, growing | Increasing adoption in enterprise and monorepos |
Conclusion
| Use Case | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Beginners / Standard projects | npm |
| React/Monorepo projects / speed | Yarn |
| Large monorepos / disk efficiency / deterministic installs | pnpm |
Bottom line: All three tools can get the job done. If disk space, speed, and strict dependency handling matter, pnpm is the clear winner. For projects already using Facebook/React stacks, Yarn works smoothly. And if you just want something simple with zero setup, npm is the default go-to.
Comments
Post a Comment